2012 JPMorgan Chase trading loss
| Industry | Financial services |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1799 |
| Headquarters | New York City , United States |
Key people | Jamie Dimon (Chairman and CEO), Ina Drew (Chief Investment Officer, former) |
| Products | Banking, financial services, investment banking, asset management |
| Website | www |
In April and May of 2012, JPMorgan's Chief Investment Office based in London experienced substantial trading losses. Under the leadership of Chief Investment Officer Ina Drew, this division conducted derivative transactions centered on credit default swaps (CDS) as part of its hedging approach. Trader Bruno Iksil, who became known as the London Whale, accumulated exceptionally large CDS positions, leading to a disclosed loss of billion dollars. Nevertheless, the overall loss sustained by JPMorgan Chase surpassed billion dollars.
These financial setbacks prompted various inquiries into JPMorgan’s risk management practices and internal oversight mechanisms. As a result, the bank consented to pay fines totaling million dollars to regulatory bodies in both the United States and the United Kingdom, including million dollars directed to UK regulators. Following the controversy, JPMorgan reduced CEO Jamie Dimon’s 2012 salary from million dollars to million dollars.
Background
In February 2012, hedge fund managers such as Boaz Weinstein from Saba Capital Management noticed irregular activities in the credit default swap (CDS) market linked to Bruno Iksil, a trader at JPMorgan Chase & Co. The initial market-impacting trades by the bank’s Chief Investment Office were identified in June 2011 by Dan Alderson of Creditflux, who observed distortions in CDX HY index tranche pricing caused by Iksil’s trading. By 2012, other market participants placed opposing bets against these positions, including another branch of JPMorgan purchasing the derivatives that the bank was selling heavily. JPMorgan initially dismissed these reports, with CEO Jamie Dimon describing it as a "tempest in a teapot." However, significant losses amounting to $2 billion were revealed in May 2012 related to these transactions, triggering investigations by the Federal Reserve, SEC, and FBI.
By July 13, 2012, reported losses had climbed to $5.8 billion following an additional $4.4 billion second-quarter loss and a revision of the first-quarter loss to $1.4 billion. JPMorgan indicated that projected losses might surpass $7 billion. The specific details of the trades remained undisclosed as positions continued generating losses, with worst-case estimates reaching up to $9 billion by late June. These trades involved CDX IG 9, a CDS index based on major U.S. corporate default risks, described as a "derivative of a derivative." During an urgent conference call, Jamie Dimon admitted that the strategy was "flawed, complex, poorly reviewed, poorly executed, and poorly monitored."
Trades
On February 2, 2012, at the Harbor Investment Conference, Boaz Weinstein recommended investors purchase the Markit CDX North America Investment Grade Series 9 10-Year Index (CDX IG 9). This standardized credit derivative contract maturing on December 20, 2017 represented the credit risk of a portfolio of North American investment-grade companies. Weinstein identified it as an unusually inexpensive method for acquiring credit protection compared to more liquid indices. JPMorgan was taking short positions on this index through large-scale trades. The bank’s wager was based on expectations of improving credit markets; this index encompasses 121 investment-grade bonds issued by North American corporations. Early in 2012, investors adhering to Weinstein’s advice faced difficulties as JPMorgan actively supported its position. By May, amid concerns about the euro area crisis, market dynamics shifted unfavorably for JPMorgan causing significant losses. Hedge funds including Saba Capital Management, Blue Mountain Capital, BlueCrest Capital, Lucidus Capital Partners, CQS, III, and Hutchin Hill profited from taking opposing positions. Another separate JPMorgan unit also recorded gains.
The $6.2 billion loss originated from three partially offsetting positions during a period characterized by relative market stability. Greater economic turmoil or shifts in quality spread curves could have intensified losses.
The Financial Times column "Alphaville" suggests that these positions alone do not fully account for the total reported losses, indicating that additional trades were involved.
Investigation
The internal inquiry was completed in July 2012, encompassing the participation of more than 1,000 staff members and external legal advisors from WilmerHale. A report issued in January 2013 identified several critical shortcomings: flawed judgment and execution by the Chief Investment Office (CIO) during early 2012; controls and supervision that failed to keep pace with growing complexity and risk exposure; inadequate risk management concerning the synthetic credit portfolio; risk limits that lacked sufficient detail; and deficient approval processes and deployment of the CIO Synthetic Credit VaR Model.
In July 2017, U.S. authorities dismissed criminal charges against two derivatives traders from France and Spain following unsuccessful attempts to extradite them.
JPM organizational structure, risk systems, accounting and internal control
The trading activities took place within the CIO, a division granted extensive freedom to engage in unsupervised trades while following strategies based on the bank’s risk modeling. At that time, JPMorgan was without a treasurer for a five-month span and had Irvin Goldman, an executive with limited experience, managing CIO risk oversight.
This department reported directly to Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon. Congressional hearings disclosed that Dimon exercised control over information disclosure, occasionally withholding details from regulatory bodies. The company also faced several Sarbanes–Oxley compliance breaches related to mandated safeguards.
On May 10, 2012, Dimon publicly revealed losses exceeding $2 billion attributed to "egregious mistakes" in trading operations.
Impact on Volcker Rule implementation
The Volcker Rule, a component of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, imposes restrictions on high-risk trading activities within commercial banking institutions. Often likened to a contemporary Glass-Steagall barrier, it aims to separate traditional banking from proprietary trading resembling hedge fund behavior. Its rollout experienced numerous postponements, initially anticipated for 2014 but delayed further due to lobbying pressures. The final regulation was adopted on December 10, 2013, becoming effective in July 2015.
Lobby efforts and government relations
According to Bloomberg News, multiple JPMorgan executives played active roles in lobbying efforts and managing interactions with government agencies amid increased regulatory scrutiny.
See also
References and sources
- References
- Sources
- Further reading
- External links