Jump to content

Kendal and Windermere Railway

From Alfawiki
Kendal and Windermere Railway
Company typePrivate company
IndustryRailway transport
Founded1845
FounderInterests in Kendal
Defunct1858
FateLeased to Lancaster and Carlisle Railway, later sold to London and North Western Railway
Headquarters
Kendal
,
England, United Kingdom
Key people
Joseph Locke (engineer), Thomas Brassey (contractor), William Mackenzie (contractor), Robert Stephenson (contractor), George Heald (contractor)
ProductsRailway passenger and freight services
ParentLondon and North Western Railway (after lease and sale)

The Kendal and Windermere Railway established a branch line diverging from the main route to serve Kendal and continuing onward to Windermere in Cumbria, located in north-west England. This initiative was driven by interests in Kendal after it became apparent that the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway would not include Kendal on its primary path. The branch extended from a junction at Oxenholme to Kendal, concluding near Windermere, which at the time was largely undeveloped. The line commenced operations in April 1847 and was engineered by Joseph Locke, with the construction undertaken by contractors Thomas Brassey, William Mackenzie, Robert Stephenson, and George Heald.

This railway branch stimulated both tourism-related travel and residential expansion, significantly contributing to Windermere’s growth. Despite this, the company faced financial difficulties and eventually sold the line to the London and North Western Railway. Around 1960, leisure-based traffic diminished notably, prompting a reduction in infrastructure complexity. The route continues to function today as the Windermere branch line.

Origin

During the 1830s, England’s developing railway system had yet to connect with Scotland’s network. By 1832, plans were underway for a northbound railway link from Preston to Carlisle and further north. The challenging landscape combined with the limited capabilities of early steam locomotives complicated route selection. One suggestion involved a coastal path featuring an expensive barrage across Morecambe Bay; however, this option was impractical due to high costs and extended distance.

Alternative routes directly traversing the region were considered feasible despite steep gradients and tunnels. Kendal, an important town situated between Lancaster and Carlisle, found itself excluded from the preferred routes, causing concern among its residents. One proposed alignment northward from Kendal through Long Sleddale required constructing a lengthy tunnel near Hawes Water.[note 1][1]

Delays in financing postponed the progress of the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway bill; however, in 1843 engineer Joseph Locke modified the route east of Kendal to reduce expenses. In reaction to this change, stakeholders from Kendal devised plans for a branch connecting their town to that railway line and extending it to the shore of Windermere, which was already recognized as a tourist spot.[2]

Parliament granted approval in 1845 through the Kendal and Windermere Railway Act 1845 (8 & 9 Vict. c. xxxii), permitting construction of a line from Oxenholme junction on the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway to Birthwaite near Windermere town. The legislation passed without opposition and received royal assent on 30 June 1845.[3] Although initially intended as a single track between Kendal and Windermere, plans were revised to incorporate double tracks without increasing the authorized share capital of £125,000.[4][5] Construction efforts were closely coordinated with those of the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway.[6]

Opening

The line was officially inaugurated on 21 September 1846, coinciding with the opening of the L&CR route between Lancaster and Kendal Junction, with passenger operations commencing the following day. Initially, services ran solely between Lancaster and Kendal until the L&CR extended further north. Some Kendal-bound trains operated as shuttle services between Kendal and Oxenholme. This arrangement persisted after the K&WR fully opened to Windermere on 20 April 1847. Freight services began earlier, on 4 January 1847. Kendal Junction functioned exclusively as a transfer platform.[7]

Early operation

At the outset, five trains traveled each way daily between Kendal and Windermere, increasing to six by summer 1853, alongside nine return journeys connecting Kendal and Oxenholme. A passenger carriage was attached to the 16:00 goods train departing Windermere. Holiday day-return fares from Kendal to Windermere were priced at 6d.[4]

The K&WR encountered continuous financial difficulties and operational challenges, compounded by frequent conflicts with the L&CR, upon which it relied for onward connections. By 1848, attempts by K&WR to lease or sell the line to L&CR were declined. Ongoing tensions included complaints over K&WR trains arriving late at Oxenholme, prompting L&CR to insist on earlier arrival times.[4][5]

Initially, rolling stock was provided by London and North Western Railway through the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway; however, in summer 1850, operations were transferred to E. B. Wilson of Leeds before K&WR assumed control in November 1851.[5]

From 1 May 1858, L&CR took on an indefinite lease of the K&WR network, formalized by the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway Act of 1859. Subsequently, L&CR itself was leased to LNWR, ensuring fixed dividend payments for K&WR shareholders. The K&WR company continued as a financial entity until 21 July 1879.[4][5]

Development

Initially isolated apart from the nearby Windermere hotel, the station capitalized on the lake’s growing reputation as a tourist attraction and a residence favored by affluent Lancashire merchants. Excursion travel and related enterprises expanded rapidly; for example, on Whit Monday in 1883, excursions attracted approximately 8,000 visitors. A dedicated club car service catered to wealthy merchants from Friday afternoons and eventually operated daily until 1939.[8]

In response to growing demand and facility shortcomings, LNWR reconstructed Kendal station in 1861 into a "handsome and substantial structure."[8]

Decline

Despite Kendal’s status as an industrial hub, the railway’s viability depended largely on leisure travel, which diminished during the 1960s. By 1973, the line was downgraded to a single track without a run-around loop at Windermere. As a result, excursion trains terminated at Oxenholme; passengers were then transferred to buses while empty trains traveled approximately 50 miles to Carlisle for servicing.

In 1986, Windermere station underwent simplification: a supermarket was constructed on its former goods yard site, and the station itself was relocated slightly from its original location.

Opposition

Resistance to the railway emerged from those worried about its effects on the Lake District scenery, including poet William Wordsworth. He expressed his objection through a sonnet condemning industrial intrusion into natural landscapes.

In reply, George Heald—one of the railway engineers—authored a counterargument highlighting the railway’s social and cultural advantages beyond mere economic benefits. He maintained that the railway democratized access to the area’s beauty for many visitors while supporting local communities by linking them with urban centres. Heald portrayed the railway not as a detriment but as an enhancement of the region’s value by encouraging tourism, cultural appreciation, and economic development.

See also

References


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "note", but no corresponding <references group="note"/> tag was found

  1. ↑ Brian Reed, Crewe to Carlisle, Ian Allan, London, 1969, ISBN 0-7110-0057-3, pages 94 to 97
  2. ↑ Reed, pages 116 to 118
  3. ↑ Donald J Grant, Directory of the Railway Companies of Great Britain, Matador Publishers, Kibworth Beauchamp, 2017, ISBN 978 1785893 537, pages 205 and 206
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Reed, pages 198 and 199
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 David Joy, A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain: volume 14: the Lake Counties, David & Charles Publishers, Newton Abbot, 1983, 0 946537 02 X, pages 201 and 202
  6. ↑ Reed, pages 139 and 140
  7. ↑ Joy, page 30
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Joy, pages 203 and 205