Mil Mi-24

Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant

Industry	Aerospace, Defense
Founded	1947 (1947)
Founder	Mikhail Mil
Headquarters	Moscow , Russia
Products	Helicopters (including Mil Mi-24)

The Mil Mi-24 (Russian: Миль Ми-24; designated by NATO reporting name as Hind) is a sizable helicopter gunship and attack helicopter that also functions as a limited-capacity transport helicopter capable of carrying eight troops. Manufactured by the Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant, it was first deployed by the Soviet Air Forces in 1972. By 2025, it remains operational in the inventories of 52 nations.

Within NATO, the export models known as Mi-25 and Mi-35 carry suffixes "Hind D" and "Hind E," respectively. Soviet aviators often referred to the Mi-24 as the "flying tank" (Russian: летающий танк, romanized: letayushchiy tank), a phrase historically linked to the renowned World War II Soviet Il-2 Shturmovik armored attack aircraft. Informally, it has also been called "Galina" or "Galya," and "Crocodile" (Russian: Крокодил, romanized: Krokodil), inspired by its distinctive camouflage pattern. Another nickname, "Drinking Glass" (Russian: Стакан, romanized: Stakan), stems from the flat glass panels surrounding the cockpits of earlier Mi-24 versions.

Development

In the early 1960s, Soviet engineer Mikhail Mil recognized that the growing demand for enhanced battlefield mobility would likely lead to the development of airborne infantry fighting vehicles capable of both troop transport and fire support roles. The initial concept took shape as a full-scale model revealed in 1966 at the Ministry of Aircraft's factory number 329 experimental division, where Mil served as chief designer. This prototype, named V-24, was derived from the earlier V-22 utility helicopter project, which had not progressed to flight testing. The V-24 featured a central compartment accommodating eight soldiers seated back-to-back, complemented by small wings mounted atop the rear section of the cabin. These wings were designed to carry up to six missiles or rockets and supported a twin-barreled GSh-23L cannon affixed to the landing gear.

File:Mil Mi-24A Hind.jpg

Mil Mi-24A displayed at Riga airport aviation museum

Mil presented this design to Soviet military leadership. Although some strategists endorsed his vision, senior officials remained skeptical, favoring traditional weapon systems over innovative concepts. Despite resistance, Mil succeeded in convincing Marshal Andrey A. Grechko, the defence minister’s first deputy, to establish an expert committee to evaluate the proposal. The panel’s assessments were divided; however, proponents eventually prevailed, leading to a call for design submissions for a battlefield support helicopter. Observing the US Army’s deployment of gunships and attack helicopters during the Vietnam War, Soviet military planners acknowledged the tactical benefits of armed rotorcraft, thereby bolstering backing for the Mi-24 project.

Mil’s engineering team developed two primary configurations: a 7-ton single-engine variant and a 10.5-ton twin-engine model, both powered by the 1,700 hp Izotov TV3-177A turboshaft. Subsequently, three full mock-ups and five cockpit mock-ups were constructed to optimize pilot and weapons operator ergonomics.

The Kamov design bureau proposed adapting their Ka-25 anti-submarine helicopter into an army variant as an economical alternative. This option was initially considered but ultimately rejected in favor of Mil’s new twin-engine design. Military demands led to several modifications, such as replacing the 23 mm cannon with a rapid-firing heavy machine gun housed in a chin turret and integrating the 9K114 Shturm (AT-6 Spiral) anti-tank missile system.

On 6 May 1968, official authorization was granted to advance development of the twin-engine model. Mil oversaw progress until his passing in 1970. Detailed design efforts commenced in August 1968 under the codename Yellow 24. By February 1969, a full-scale mock-up received approval following review. Flight testing began on 15 September 1969 with tethered hovering trials; four days later, the prototype completed its maiden free flight. A second prototype followed, succeeded by a production run of ten test helicopters.

File:Russian Air Force Mil Mi-24P Dvurekov-4.jpg

Russian Air Force Mil Mi-24P

Formal acceptance trials started in June 1970 and spanned eighteen months. Design revisions addressed issues related to structural integrity, fatigue resistance, and vibration reduction. To counteract the aircraft’s tendency toward Dutch roll at speeds exceeding 200 km/h (124 mph), engineers introduced a 12-degree anhedral angle to the wings and relocated Falanga missile pylons from the fuselage to wingtip positions. The tail rotor was repositioned from the right side of the tail boom to the left, with its rotation direction reversed; this change allowed it to operate within the main rotor’s downwash zone, thereby enhancing efficiency. Additional refinements culminated in the production version Mi-24A (izdeliye 245), which entered manufacturing in 1970, reached initial operating capability by 1971, and was formally inducted into service in 1972.

Following completion of the Mi-24 in 1972, development commenced on a specialized attack helicopter with limited transport capacity—accommodating three troops instead of eight—designated as the Mi-28. Alongside this was development of the Ka-50, a smaller and more agile attack helicopter lacking a large troop compartment. In October 2007, the Russian Air Force announced plans to phase out its Mi-24 fleet by replacing them with Mi-28Ns and Ka-52s by 2015. Nevertheless, after successful deployment during operations in Syria, it was decided to retain and modernize the Mi-24 fleet with upgraded avionics, targeting systems, weaponry, and night vision equipment.

Overview

File:Mil Mi-35M (51 yellow).jpg

Russian Air Force Mi-35М

The aircraft's foundation was developed from the Mil Mi-8 (NATO codename "Hip"), featuring two turboshaft engines mounted on top, which power a mid-positioned 17.3 m (57 ft) five-blade main rotor alongside a three-bladed tail rotor. This engine layout results in the helicopter's recognizable dual air intake design. Earlier models display an angular greenhouse-style cockpit, whereas the Model D and subsequent versions incorporate a distinctive tandem cockpit arrangement with a "double bubble" canopy. Additional structural elements were borrowed from the Mi-14 "Haze." The helicopter is equipped with two stub wings located mid-fuselage, each containing three weapon hardpoints and contributing to overall lift. The specific armament depends on mission requirements; Mi-24s are capable of executing close air support, anti-tank engagements, or aerial combat roles.

The rotor blades of the Mi-24 are constructed from titanium, providing resistance against 12.7 mm (.50 caliber) projectiles. The cockpit features ballistic-resistant windshields and a titanium-armored crew compartment. To safeguard the crew during NBC conditions, the cockpit and crew area are maintained under overpressure.

Flight characteristics

File:Helicopter Cockpit Mil Mi-24D Hind.jpg

Mi-24D cockpit

File:MAKS-2015first07.jpg

Mi-35M equipped with OPS-24N reconnaissance and targeting system alongside the gyrostabilized OLS GOES-324

Significant efforts were dedicated to enhancing the Mi-24's speed capabilities. Its airframe was aerodynamically refined and outfitted with retractable tricycle undercarriage landing gear to minimize drag. At elevated speeds, the wings generate substantial lift, contributing up to 25% of total lift. To counteract the helicopter’s natural tendency to drift during hover (translating tendency), the main rotor is angled 2.5° to the right relative to the fuselage. The landing gear is tilted leftward so that when grounded, the rotor remains level while the airframe leans left. Additionally, an asymmetrical tail design creates lateral force at speed, alleviating load on the tail rotor.

A specialized variant of the Mi-24B, designated A-10, participated in multiple world record attempts focusing on speed and climb performance. This version underwent extensive weight reduction modifications—including removal of stub wings—to optimize performance. On 13 August 1975, it set an official speed record over a closed 1,000 km (620 mi) course at 332.65 km/h (206.70 mph); numerous female-specific records were achieved by an all-female crew comprising Galina Rastorguyeva and Lyudmila Polyanskaya. The A-10 set an absolute helicopter speed record on 21 September 1978, reaching 368.4 km/h (228.9 mph) over a 15/25 km course. This record remained unbroken until 1986 when a modified British Westland Lynx surpassed it.

Comparison with Western helicopters

File:Mi-24 Desert Rescue.jpg

U.S. operated Mi-24P Hind-F

File:Mi-24 Super Agile Hind on ground 2006.jpg

Mi-24 SuperHind, a modernized version of the Hind developed by South African company ATE. Displayed at the Ysterplaat Airshow 2006.

The Mi-24 stands out as a unique hybrid, combining features of an armored gunship and a troop carrier, with no exact counterpart among NATO helicopters. During the Vietnam War, the US employed UH-1 ("Huey") helicopters either for troop transport or as gunships; however, these roles were mutually exclusive. Transforming a UH-1 into a gunship necessitated removing the entire passenger compartment to make room for additional fuel and ammunition, thereby eliminating its capacity to carry troops. In contrast, the Mi-24 was engineered to fulfill both functions simultaneously, a capability extensively utilized by Soviet airborne forces throughout the 1980–89 Soviet–Afghan War. The closest Western analogue is the American Sikorsky S-67 Blackhawk, which incorporated similar design concepts and was crafted as a fast, agile attack helicopter with limited troop transport abilities, employing numerous parts from the Sikorsky S-61. Nevertheless, the S-67 never entered active service. Additional Western counterparts include Romania’s IAR 330, an armed variant produced under license from the Aérospatiale SA 330 Puma, and the MH-60 Direct Action Penetrator, a specialized armed modification of the Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk.

Ogaden War (1977–1978)

The Mi-24 saw its initial combat deployment with Ethiopian forces during the Ogaden War against Somalia. These helicopters were part of a substantial Soviet airlift of military hardware after the USSR shifted its allegiance late in 1977. Playing a crucial role in coordinated air and ground operations, the Mi-24s helped Ethiopian troops reclaim the Ogaden region by early 1978.

Chadian–Libyan conflict (1978–1987)

During their repeated interventions in Chad’s civil war, Libyan forces deployed Mi-24A and Mi-25 helicopters. The Mi-24s made their combat debut in October 1980 during the battle for N'Djamena, supporting the People's Armed Forces in capturing the capital city.

In March 1987, forces known as the Armed Forces of the North, supported by both the US and France, seized a Libyan airbase at Ouadi-Doum in northern Chad. This operation, known as Operation Mount Hope III, resulted in capturing three Mi-25 helicopters. These aircraft were transferred to France, which subsequently provided one to the United Kingdom and another to the United States.

Soviet conflict in Afghanistan (1979–1989)

File:Mi-24V Soviet1.jpg

Front perspective of a Soviet Mi-24 HIND E attack helicopter

During the Soviet–Afghan War, this helicopter was heavily utilized, primarily to bomb Mujahideen combatants. After the United States provided heat-seeking Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen, the Soviet Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopters became prime targets for the insurgents.

Determining the exact number of Mi-24 helicopters deployed in Afghanistan remains challenging. By late 1990, the entire Soviet Army inventory included 1,420 Mi-24s. Estimates during the Afghan conflict suggested helicopter forces numbered up to 600 units, with approximately 250 being Mi-24s, while a declassified 1987 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) document reported an increase in Mi-24 numbers from 85 in 1980 to 120 by 1985.

Initial deployment and combat operations

In April 1979, the Afghan government received Mi-24 helicopters to counter Mujahideen insurgents. Afghan pilots demonstrated proficient handling of these aircraft; however, engaging Mujahideen fighters proved challenging. The first recorded loss of a Mi-24 occurred on 18 July 1979 when guerrilla forces successfully downed one.

File:SovietafghanwarTanksHelicopters.jpg

Soviet combined "Helicopter-tank" operation during the Afghan conflict

Despite enduring fierce opposition from Afghan fighters, the Mi-24 demonstrated significant destructive capability. Insurgents nicknamed it "Shaitan-Arba (Satan's Chariot)". On one occasion, a Mi-24 pilot out of ammunition managed to protect an infantry company by aggressively maneuvering toward Mujahideen forces and forcing them to retreat. Ground troops favored the Mi-24 because it could remain engaged on the battlefield and deliver fire support continuously, unlike fast-moving strike jets, which had to return quickly to base for refueling.

The preferred armament for the Mi-24 was the 80-millimetre (3.1 in) S-8 rocket, as the lighter 57 mm (2.2 in) S-5 rockets lacked sufficient impact. The 23 mm (0.91 in) gun pod was also widely used. Crews often carried additional rocket rounds inside the helicopter to allow rapid reloading during field landings. For assaults on camps or fortified positions, the Mi-24 could deploy ten 100-kilogram (220 lb) iron bombs; tougher targets required payloads of four 250-kilogram (550 lb) or two 500-kilogram (1,100 lb) bombs. Some crews developed expertise in precision bombing. Fuel-air explosive ordnance was occasionally employed; however, initial underestimation of their blast effects led to crews being affected by shockwaves. The use of the 9K114 Shturm missile was limited initially due to few suitable targets early in the war and a desire to conserve anti-tank missile reserves in Europe. As Mujahideen acquired more advanced anti-aircraft weapons later on, usage of the Shturm missile by Mi-24 units increased.

Operational experience revealed drawbacks in transporting troops aboard the Mi-24. Gunship crews viewed passengers as distractions under fire and preferred flying with minimal load, especially given Afghanistan’s high-altitude terrain. To reduce weight, armor protection around the troop compartment was frequently removed. Infantry transport duties were mostly assigned to Mi-8 helicopters while Mi-24s concentrated on providing fire support.

File:Миль Ми-24-25-35, Вязьма - Двоевка RP57606.jpg

Mil Mi-24/25

Including a technician within the crew compartment proved advantageous for operating a light machine gun through a window port, allowing some defensive capability while departing a target zone. In some configurations, machine guns were installed on both sides so that the technician could switch sides without relocating the weapon.

Nevertheless, this setup left a blind spot directly behind the gunship. Mil attempted fitting a rear-facing machine gun accessible by a narrow crawlway through the fuselage for the gunner’s use; however, this modification was unsuccessful due to cramped space filled with engine exhaust fumes and overall discomfort. During one demonstration, an overweight Soviet Air Force general became stuck inside this crawl space. To improve situational awareness, operational Mi-24s were later equipped with rear-view mirrors enabling pilots to detect threats approaching from behind and execute evasive maneuvers.

Beyond escorting troop insertions and supporting ground forces, the Mi-24 also guarded convoys by employing rockets armed with flechette warheads to repel ambushes; conducted strikes against predetermined targets; and carried out "hunter-killer" patrols. These hunter-killer operations were conducted at minimum in pairs but commonly involved groups of four or eight aircraft for mutual fire coverage. In response to these tactics, Mujahideen adapted by moving predominantly at night to evade gunship attacks. Consequently, Soviet crews trained extensively in night combat techniques and deployed parachute flares to illuminate potential targets; however, insurgents quickly learned to disperse rapidly upon flare deployment nearby.

Attrition in Afghanistan

The conflict in Afghanistan resulted in significant attritional losses. The harsh environment, characterized by frequent dust and high temperatures, posed considerable challenges to the machinery. To address the dusty conditions, the development of twin PZU ('PyleZashchitnoe Ustroystvo') air intake filters was implemented. Early in the conflict, insurgents primarily relied on heavy machine guns and anti-aircraft artillery for air defense; however, weapons firing projectiles smaller than 23 millimetres generally inflicted minimal damage on the Mi-24. The cockpit glass was designed to withstand rounds up to 12.7 mm (.50 caliber).

Rebels rapidly incorporated Soviet and American shoulder-fired man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) such as the Strela (SA-7) and Redeye (FIM-43), sourced either from captured Soviet or Afghan stockpiles or supplied by Western allies. Many of these weapons originated from Israeli captures during conflicts with Soviet-supported Middle Eastern states. Due to a combination of limited missile capabilities, inadequate training, and poor missile condition, their effectiveness was relatively low. Instead, the RPG-7—initially created as an anti-tank weapon—emerged as the first practical countermeasure against the Hind helicopter. Although not designed for air defense, the RPG-7 had inherent drawbacks in this role: firing at angles necessary to hit aerial targets exposed the shooter to back-blast injuries, and the resulting smoke and dust clouds revealed their position.

Beginning in 1986, the CIA supplied Afghan fighters with advanced Stinger heat-seeking shoulder-launched SAMs. These represented a substantial upgrade compared to earlier models. Unlike the Redeye and SA-7, which tracked only infrared emissions, the Stinger could lock onto both infrared and ultraviolet signatures. This capability allowed operators to target aircraft from multiple angles rather than solely from behind and made the missile more resistant to countermeasures like flares. Furthermore, Mil helicopters—especially the Mi-24—had a design vulnerability related to engine placement that increased susceptibility to Stinger attacks. The inline engine configuration intended to streamline the helicopter for higher speed and reduce frontal exposure inadvertently directed exhaust gases directly out the side of the aircraft, away from rotor wash. This created two prominent heat and ultraviolet sources that facilitated missile targeting. This flaw was significant enough that Mil abandoned it in their successor model, the Mi-28, opting instead for engine placement similar to Western attack helicopters that vent exhaust into rotor wash to disperse heat.

Originally, Mi-24 attack tactics involved high-altitude approaches followed by steep dives toward targets. The introduction of Stinger missiles prompted a shift toward "nap-of-the-earth" flying techniques, involving low-altitude lateral approaches with brief ascents of approximately 200 feet to engage targets with rockets or cannons. To enhance survivability, all Soviet Mil Mi-2, Mi-8, and Mi-24 helicopters were equipped with missile warning systems and countermeasure flares, allowing pilots opportunities to evade incoming missiles. Heat dissipation devices were also added to exhausts to reduce thermal signatures. Tactical adaptations aimed at complicating enemy missile deployment helped mitigate but did not fully eliminate the Stinger threat.

Mi-24s additionally served as protective escorts for jet transports entering and leaving Kabul, deploying flares to confuse heat-seeking missiles. The crews adopted the nickname "Mandatory Matrosovs," honoring a Soviet World War II hero who sacrificed himself by covering a German machine gun position to enable his comrades’ advance.

Russian accounts report losses of 74 helicopters during the conflict, including 27 shot down by Stingers and two by Redeyes. Many helicopters demonstrated robust armor and construction that allowed them to sustain substantial damage yet still return safely to base.

Mi-24 Crews and Conclusion of Soviet Engagement

To enhance their survival chances if forced to land, Mi-24 crews were equipped with AK-74 assault rifles alongside other personal firearms. Early in the conflict, Marat Tischenko, the head of the Mil design bureau, visited Afghanistan to gather feedback from operational personnel about his helicopters. During this visit, gunship crews performed several demonstrations, including complex manoeuvres like barrel rolls—movements previously deemed unfeasible by the design team. Tischenko was left astonished, stating, "I believed I understood my helicopters' capabilities, but now I have doubts!"

The final Soviet Mi-24 downed occurred on the night of 2 February 1989, resulting in the loss of both crew members. This incident also marked the last helicopter loss for Soviet forces throughout nearly a decade of combat operations.

Mi-24s in Afghanistan Post-Soviet Withdrawal

File:Afghan Air Corps Mi-35 helicopters.jpg

Two Mil Mi-35 Hind helicopters conducting a training flight over southern Afghanistan on 4 October 2009. U.S. Airmen from the 438th Air Expeditionary Training Group are involved.

Mi-24 helicopters transferred to Afghan forces aligned with the Soviets during the war continued to see limited use amid the protracted civil war following the Soviet exit.

As the Taliban gained control, many Afghan Air Force Mi-24s fell into disrepair and ceased operation; however, a handful operated by the Northern Alliance, supported by Russian aid and spare parts, remained active until the US-led invasion in late 2001. In 2008, six refurbished Mi-35 helicopters were acquired from the Czech Republic by the Afghan Air Force. Indian instructors trained Afghan pilots who commenced live-fire drills in May 2009 to provide escort for Mi-17 transport helicopters during missions in volatile regions.

Iran–Iraq War (1980–1988)

During the prolonged conflict with Iran, the Iraqi Army extensively deployed the Mi-25 helicopter. Its formidable firepower inflicted significant casualties on Iranian ground units. Nevertheless, its anti-tank capabilities were limited due to reliance on outdated 9M17 Skorpion missiles. Consequently, Iraqi forces developed innovative attack tactics with assistance from East German military advisors. These tactics involved "hunter-killer" teams pairing Mi-25s with French-built Aérospatiale Gazelle helicopters: Mi-25s would spearhead assaults using their heavy armaments to suppress Iranian air defences while Gazelles targeted armored vehicles using their HOT missiles. This approach effectively countered Iranian offensives such as Operation Ramadan in July 1982.

File:Mi24 tehran.jpg

An Iraqi Mil Mi-25 helicopter shot down during the Iran–Iraq War, exhibited at a military museum in Tehran.

This conflict witnessed the only verified air-to-air helicopter engagements ever recorded, with Iraqi Mi-25s clashing against Iranian AH-1J SeaCobra gunships (supplied by the United States prior to the Iranian Revolution) on multiple occasions. Shortly after Iraq's invasion in November 1980, two Iranian SeaCobras fired TOW wire-guided anti-tank missiles at two Mi-25s; one was immediately destroyed while the other was severely damaged and crashed before returning to base. On 24 April 1981, Iranians repeated this feat by downing two Mi-25s without sustaining losses. Additionally, an IRIAF F-14A fighter shot down a Mi-25 during this period.

Iraqi forces retaliated by claiming to have shot down an Iranian SeaCobra on 14 September 1983 using its YaKB machine gun, followed by three SeaCobras on 5 February 1984 and an additional three on 25 February 1984 (two destroyed with Falanga missiles and one with S-5 rockets). A report from a 1982 issue of the Iraqi Observer asserted that an Iraqi Mi-24D successfully downed an Iranian F-4 Phantom II utilizing its onboard weapons—possibly anti-tank missiles, guns or S-5 rockets.

Following a period with fewer helicopter losses, both sides lost gunships on 13 February 1986. Subsequently, a Mi-25 claimed a SeaCobra kill with its YaKB gun on 16 February, while a SeaCobra reportedly destroyed a Mi-25 using rockets on 18 February. The last recorded encounter between these helicopter types occurred on 22 May 1986 when Mi-25s shot down a SeaCobra. The final tally stood at ten SeaCobras and six Mi-25s lost. Due to relatively low numbers and conflicting claims over kills, it remains uncertain whether either platform held clear technical superiority. Additionally, Iraqi Mi-25s claimed approximately forty-three victories against other Iranian helicopters such as Agusta-Bell UH-1 Hueys.

Overall, Iraqi pilots appreciated the Mi-25 for its considerable speed, extended range, adaptability, and substantial weapons capacity but criticized its relatively ineffective anti-tank guided missiles and limited manoeuvrability.

Nicaraguan civil war (1980–1988)

During the 1980s civil conflict, the Nicaraguan Army operated Mi-25 helicopters. In the mid-1980s, Nicaragua acquired 12 Mi-25s (some reports suggest up to 18) to counter the activities of the Contra insurgents. These helicopters were deployed for ground assault missions against the Contras and possessed sufficient speed to engage light aircraft utilized by rebel forces. The arrival of the Mi-25s was viewed by the U.S. Reagan Administration as a significant escalation in Central American tensions.

The Contras successfully downed two Mi-25s using Stinger missiles. Another Mi-25 sustained damage while chasing Contra forces near the Honduran border, after being intercepted by Honduran F-86 Sabre and A-37 Dragonfly aircraft. Additionally, in December 1988, a Sandinista pilot defected and flew a fourth Mi-25 into Honduras.

Sri Lankan Civil War (1987–2009)

Between 1987 and 1990, the Indian Peace Keeping Force deployed Mi-24 helicopters during their mission in Sri Lanka, supporting both Indian and Sri Lankan military operations against several Tamil militant factions, notably the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The heavy firepower provided by these Mi-24s is credited with significantly lowering Indian casualties. Throughout this deployment, no Indian Mi-24s were lost, as the LTTE lacked effective weapons to threaten these gunships at that time.

Starting from 14 November 1995, the Sri Lanka Air Force has employed Mi-24 helicopters in its campaign against the LTTE insurgency, demonstrating notable effectiveness in providing close air support to ground troops. The SLAF operates various models including Mi-24/-35P and Mi-24V/-35 variants within its No. 9 Attack Helicopter Squadron. Recent upgrades have incorporated advanced Israeli FLIR technology and enhanced electronic warfare capabilities. Five of these helicopters were further modified for aerial interception roles by integrating radar systems, fully operational helmet-mounted target tracking devices, and air-to-air missiles. Over five Mi-24s have been lost to LTTE-operated MANPADS, with two additional helicopters destroyed during air base assaults; one damaged helicopter was subsequently repaired and returned to active duty.

Peruvian operations (1989–present)

Following the 1981 Paquisha conflict with Ecuador, the Peruvian Air Force acquired 12 Mi-25D helicopters and 2 Mi-25DU models from the Soviet Union during 1983, 1984, and 1985. In 1992, an additional seven pre-owned helicopters (comprising 4 Mi-24D and 3 Mi-25D units) were procured from Nicaragua. These aircraft have since been stationed permanently at the Vitor airbase near La Joya, where they are operated by the 2nd Air Group of the 211th Air Squadron. Their initial operational use took place in June 1989 amid the internal conflict, targeting mainly the Shining Path insurgents in the Peruvian highlands. Although hostilities persist, their intensity has diminished and is now confined largely to jungle zones within the Valley of Rivers—Apurímac, Ene, and Mantaro (VRAEM).

File:MI-35P FAP (crop).jpg

A Peruvian Mi-35P

During the brief Cenepa conflict in early 1995, Peru deployed Mi-25 helicopters against Ecuadorian forces. The sole loss occurred on 7 February when a Peruvian Air Force Mi-25 was shot down after sustaining hits from at least two, possibly three, 9K38 Igla man-portable air-defense missiles during a low-level operation over the Cenepa valley. All three crew members aboard were killed.

In 2011, two Mi-35P helicopters were acquired from Russia to strengthen the capabilities of the 211th Air Squadron.

Persian Gulf War (1991)

File:Mi-24 Iraqi.jpg

An Iraqi Mi-25 Hind-D helicopter seized during the 1991 Persian Gulf conflict.

During the Kuwait invasion, the Iraqi Army extensively deployed the Mi-24. However, most units were pulled back by Saddam Hussein once it became clear these aircraft would be essential for maintaining his regime’s control following the conflict. In the subsequent 1991 uprisings in Iraq, these helicopters were utilized against insurgents as well as civilians attempting to escape.

Sierra Leone Civil War (1991–2002)

A trio of Mi-24Vs operated by Sierra Leone and piloted by South African contractors, including notable pilot Neall Ellis, were deployed against the RUF insurgents. In 1995, these helicopters played a key role in expelling RUF forces from Sierra Leone’s capital, Freetown. Additionally, Neall Ellis flew a Mi-24 during the British-commanded Operation Barras targeting the West Side Boys. Meanwhile, Guinea deployed its Mi-24 fleet against RUF forces across the border and was accused of providing aerial assistance to the LURD rebellion in northern Liberia between 2001 and 2003.

Croatian War of Independence (1990s)

In 1993, Croatia received twelve Mi-24 helicopters, which were notably utilized by the Croatian Army during Operation Storm in 1995 against the Army of Krajina. These helicopters played a key role in penetrating enemy lines and disrupting the communication networks of the Krajina forces. One Croatian Mi-24 was lost near Drvar, Bosnia and Herzegovina, after encountering severe wind conditions; fortunately, both the pilot and crew member survived the incident. The Croatian fleet of Mi-24s was sourced from Ukraine, with one unit specifically adapted to carry Mark 46 torpedoes. The service life of these helicopters in Croatia concluded in 2004.

First and Second Wars in Chechnya (1990s–2000s)

Throughout the First Chechen War beginning in 1994 and the Second Chechen War starting in 1999, Russian military forces deployed Mi-24 helicopters extensively. During the initial year of the Second Chechen War, Russian troops lost 11 Mi-24 units, approximately half of which were destroyed due to hostile engagements.

Sudanese Civil War (1995–2005)

The Sudanese Air Force incorporated six Mi-24 helicopters in 1995 to support operations in Southern Sudan and the Nuba Mountains, targeting the SPLA during the Second Sudanese Civil War. Within their first year of deployment, at least two helicopters were lost outside combat scenarios. An additional twelve Mi-24s were procured in 2001 and saw extensive use around Southern Sudan’s oil-producing regions. These helicopters were also active in Darfur during 2004–2005.

First and Second Congo Wars (1996–2003)

Mobutu’s forces operated three Mi-24 helicopters, which were subsequently transferred to the newly formed Air Force of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These aircraft arrived in Zaire in 1997 under a French-Serbian agreement, with at least one flown by Serbian mercenaries. On 27 March 1997, a Mi-24 collided with power lines and crashed, resulting in the deaths of three crew members and four passengers. Additionally, Zimbabwean Mi-24s supported operations alongside Congolese ground forces.

During the Second Congo War, the United Nations peacekeeping contingent utilized Mi-24/-35 helicopters operated by the Indian Air Force to provide aerial support. The Indian Air Force has maintained a presence in this region since 2003.

Kosovo War (1998–1999)

During the early 1990s, two pre-owned Mi-24V helicopters were acquired from Ukraine and subsequently operated by the Yugoslav Special Operation Unit (JSO) in combat against Kosovo Albanian insurgents throughout the Kosovo War.

Insurgency in Macedonia (2001)

File:MAF Mi-24.jpg

North Macedonia Mi-24V

The Macedonian armed forces obtained second-hand Ukrainian Mi-24V helicopters, which saw extensive deployment against Albanian rebel groups during the 2001 insurgency in Macedonia (present-day North Macedonia). Key conflict zones included Tetovo, Radusha, and Aracinovo.

Ivorian Civil War (2002–2004)

Throughout the Ivorian Civil War, government troops were supported by five Mil Mi-24 helicopters operated by hired mercenaries. These aircraft were eventually destroyed by the French Army in response to an aerial strike on a French military base that resulted in the deaths of nine French soldiers.

War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)

File:Afghan Air Corps Mi-35 on Kandahar, 2009.jpg

An Afghan Air Force Mi-35 flying over Kandahar in 2009

In 2008 and 2009, the Czech Republic contributed six Mi-24 helicopters under the ANA Equipment Donation Programme, enhancing the Afghan National Army Air Corps' (ANAAC) capability to provide armed escort for its transport helicopters. The ANAAC currently operates nine Mi-35 helicopters. Notably, Major Caleb Nimmo of the United States Air Force became the first American pilot to fly a Mi-35 Hind, or any Russian helicopter, during combat operations. On 13 September 2011, an Afghan Air Force Mi-35 played a critical role in repelling an assault targeting ISAF and police facilities.

The Polish Helicopter Detachment also deployed Mi-24s as part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). Polish aviators underwent training in Germany prior to deployment and regularly collaborated with U.S. personnel. On 26 January 2011, a Mi-24 caught fire during takeoff at its Ghazni base; all personnel on board—one American and four Polish soldiers—escaped without injury.

India contributed to Afghan air capabilities by donating four Mi-35 helicopters, with three delivered by January 2016. According to General John Campbell, then commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, these Indian-supplied Mi-35s significantly enhanced offensive operations against insurgents.

Iraq War (2003–2011)

Following December 2004, the Polish forces deployed to Iraq operated six Mi-24D helicopters. On 18 July 2006, one of these helicopters crashed at an airbase located in Al Diwaniyah. Due to their age, condition, limited combat effectiveness of the Mi-24D model, and the expense involved in transportation, these Polish Mi-24Ds were not brought back to Poland. Instead, depending on their state, they were either handed over to the new Iraqi Army or dismantled.

War in Somalia (2006–2009) and Somali Civil War (2009–present)

During Ethiopia's military intervention in Somalia from 2006 to 2009, the Ethiopian Air Force deployed approximately three Mil Mi-35 and ten Mil Mi-24D attack helicopters. On 30 March 2007, Somali insurgents shot down one helicopter amid the Battle of Mogadishu (March–April 2007).

In 2012, three Mi-24 helicopters belonging to the Ugandan Air Force, while en route to Somalia for counterinsurgency missions, crashed within Kenyan territory. Later, in July 2025, an Mi-24 assigned to support AUSSOM alongside Somali National Army forces was destroyed following a crash in Mogadishu.

2008 Russo-Georgian War

Both combatants employed Mil Mi-24 helicopters during the conflict in South Ossetia. The Georgian Air Force initiated attacks with Mi-24s early on 8 August, striking first at the Ossetian presidential palace and subsequently targeting a cement plant near Tskhinvali, which housed significant enemy personnel and ammunition. The final operational sortie for Georgian Mi-24s occurred on 11 August when they decimated a large Russian convoy comprising light trucks and BMP infantry fighting vehicles en route to the Georgian village of Avnevi.

The Georgian Air Force lost two Mi-24s at Senaki airbase; these helicopters were rendered inoperable after being destroyed by Russian ground forces. Conversely, Russian forces extensively utilized Mi-24s throughout the hostilities. Upgraded Russian Mi-24PN models were credited with night-time destruction of two Georgian T-72SIM1 tanks using guided missiles, although some reports suggest these kills may have been achieved by Mil Mi-28 helicopters. The Russian military did not suffer any losses of Mi-24s during the conflict, largely because these aircraft operated in zones without active Georgian air defenses; however, several sustained damage from small arms fire, and at least one was lost due to mechanical failure.

Conflict in Chad (2008)

Upon their return to Abeche, one of the Chadian Mi-35 helicopters was forced to make an emergency landing at the airport. Reports indicated that rebel forces had shot it down.

Libyan civil war (2011)

File:Libyan Air Force Mil Mi-35 Lofting.jpg

A Libyan Air Force Mil Mi-35

During the 2011 Libyan civil war, Mi-24 helicopters operated by the Libyan Air Force were deployed by both factions to strike opposing forces. Several of these aircraft were seized by rebel forces, who subsequently established the Free Libyan Air Force by incorporating these captured assets. On 23 February 2011, during combat at Benina airport, an Mi-35 with serial number 853 was destroyed while on the ground. In this engagement, serial number 854 was also taken by rebel fighters, along with an Mi-14 bearing serial number 1406.Template:Fix/category Later, on 26 March 2011, French jets enforcing the no-fly zone destroyed two Mi-35 helicopters belonging to the loyalist Libyan Air Force while they were grounded. On 9 April 2011, a Free Libyan Air Force Mi-25D (serial number 854), which had been captured early in the uprising, breached the no-fly zone to attack loyalist targets in Ajdabiya. It was subsequently downed by ground fire from Libyan forces, resulting in the death of its pilot, Captain Hussein Al-Warfali.Template:Fix/category Rebel sources asserted that multiple other Mi-25 helicopters were also shot down during the conflict.

2010–2011 Ivorian crisis

During the 2010–2011 Ivorian crisis, Mi-24P helicopters operated by the Ukrainian army as part of the United Nations peacekeeping mission launched four missiles targeting a military base loyal to Gbagbo in Abidjan, the principal city of Ivory Coast.

Syrian Civil War (2011–2024)

The Syrian Air Force has deployed Mi-24 helicopters throughout the ongoing Syrian Civil War, including operations within several key urban centers. There has been dispute regarding the reported transfer of Mi-25 helicoptersTemplate:By whom to Syrian government forces, as Turkey and other NATO countries have prohibited such arms shipments passing through their regions.Template:Fix/category

On 3 November 2016, a Russian Mi-35 was forced to conduct an emergency landing near the city of Palmyra in Syria, where it was subsequently destroyed—likely by an unguided recoilless rifle—after touching down. The helicopter's crew managed to return safely to the Khmeimim air base.

Second Kachin conflict (2011–present)

The Mi-24 helicopter has been employed by the Myanmar Air Force in its campaign against the Kachin Independence Army during the ongoing Kachin conflict. During intense clashes in northern Burma’s mountainous regions in 2012 and early 2013, two Mi-35 helicopters were downed by the Kachin Independence Army.

On the morning of 3 May 2021, a Myanmar Air Force Mi-35 was shot down by a MANPADS fired by the Kachin Independence Army amid air strikes involving attack helicopters and fighter jets. Footage surfaced depicting the helicopter being struck while flying over a village.

Post-U.S. Iraqi insurgency

In 2013, Iraq placed an order for 34 Mi-35M helicopters as part of a broader arms agreement with Russia, which also encompassed Mi-28 attack helicopters. The initial batch of four units was publicly confirmed by then-Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki in November of the same year.

These helicopters were first deployed in late December to target camps held by the al-Qaeda-affiliated Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and other Islamist insurgents in al-Anbar province. These groups had seized control over multiple locations within Fallujah and Ramadi. The military released FLIR footage documenting these strikes.

On 3 October 2014, ISIL forces reportedly downed an Iraqi Army Mi-35M attack helicopter in Baiji using an FN-6 shoulder-fired missile. Additionally, ISIL-released video evidence indicates that at least two more Iraqi Mi-35s were destroyed by light anti-aircraft weapons.

Balochistan Insurgency (2012–present)

In 2018, Pakistan acquired four Mi-35M Hind-E attack helicopters from Russia as part of a $153 million agreement. These gunships are currently deployed at the Army Aviation Corps facility located in Quetta Cantonment. Since their induction, these helicopters have been actively engaged in multiple counter-insurgency missions targeting various militant factions within Pakistan's Balochistan province. In early 2022, the Frontier Corps Balochistan paramilitary faced assaults on a base in Nushki and a checkpoint in Panjgur by militants affiliated with the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). While the Nushki attack was quickly thwarted, the situation in Panjgur required reinforcement. Consequently, Mi-35 Hind and AH-1F Cobra gunships were deployed to provide critical ground support and reconnaissance, contributing significantly to the successful counterattack.

Russian annexation of Crimea (2014)

During Russia's annexation of Crimea, 13 Mi-24 helicopters were deployed to back infantry movements throughout the operation. Despite their presence, these aircraft did not engage in any combat activities during this period.

War in Donbas (2014–2022)

File:Практичне авіанаведення українських екіпажів Мі-24 по умовних цілях противника 04.jpg

Ukrainian Mil Mi-24 undergoing training amid the Donbas conflict

On 2 May 2014, amid the Siege of Sloviansk, two Ukrainian Mi-24 helicopters were downed by pro-Russian separatists. Ukrainian authorities reported that these helicopters were struck by MANPADS while conducting patrols near Sloviansk. The government confirmed both aircraft were lost, alongside an Mi-8 helicopter damaged by small arms fire. Initial casualty reports indicated two fatalities and several wounded; however, it was later verified that five crew members perished and one was captured before being released on 5 May. On 5 May 2014, another Ukrainian Mi-24 was compelled to execute an emergency landing after sustaining machine gun fire near Sloviansk. The pilots were rescued by Ukrainian forces, who subsequently destroyed the helicopter using a rocket strike from a Su-25 aircraft to prevent its seizure by separatist forces. During operations at Donetsk International Airport, Ukrainian Mi-24 helicopters received support from Su-25 ground attack jets, with MiG-29 fighters providing air cover. On 13 October 2018, a Ukrainian Mi-24 successfully engaged and destroyed an Orlan-10 unmanned aerial vehicle using its onboard cannon near Lysychansk.

Chadian Campaign Against Boko Haram (2015)

During the 2015 West African offensive targeting Boko Haram, Chadian Mi-24 helicopters were actively deployed.

Azerbaijan-Karabakh Conflict (2014–2016, 2020)

On 12 November 2014, Azerbaijani troops successfully downed an Armenian Mi-24 helicopter, which was part of a pair flying near the contested border adjacent to the frontline between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. The helicopter was struck by an Igla-S man-portable air-defense system launched by Azerbaijani soldiers while operating at a low altitude, resulting in a crash that killed all three personnel aboard.

During the 2016 Karabakh clashes on 2 April 2016, an Azerbaijani Mi-24 helicopter was shot down by forces from Nagorno-Karabakh. This incident was officially confirmed by Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Defence.

On 9 November 2020, amid the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, Azerbaijani forces shot down a Russian Mi-24 helicopter using a MANPADS system. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry characterized the event as accidental. Two crew members lost their lives, while one sustained moderate injuries. The Russian Defence Ministry issued an official statement confirming the helicopter’s downing later that same day.

Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)

Throughout the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Mi-24 helicopters have been actively deployed by both Ukrainian and Russian forces. On 1 March 2022, Ukrainian troops successfully downed a Russian Mi-35M helicopter using MANPADS over the Kyiv Reservoir (see also Battle of Kyiv). Subsequently, on 5 May 2022, Ukrainian engineers recovered this helicopter in Vyshgorod. Two additional Russian Mi-35 helicopters were destroyed by MANPADS on 5 March 2022. On 6 March, a Mi-24P bearing the registration RF-94966 was shot down by Ukrainian MANPADS within Kyiv Oblast.

A Ukrainian Mil Mi-24 from the Ukrainian 16th Army Aviation Brigade was lost near Brovary, Kyiv on 8 March 2022, resulting in the deaths of pilots Col. Oleksandr Maryniak and Cptn. Ivan Bezzub. On 17 March, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence reported the destruction of a Russian Mi-35M at an undisclosed location. Additionally, on 1 April 2022, two Ukrainian Mi-24 helicopters reportedly crossed into Russian territory and struck an oil storage facility in Belgorod.

In May 2022, the Czech Republic contributed Mi-24 helicopters to Ukraine’s military capabilities. By July 2023, reports indicated that Poland had covertly supplied at least twelve Mi-24s to Ukraine. Towards the end of 2023, Russia attempted to purchase a decommissioned Mi-35 from the Brazilian Air Force, but the Brazilian government refused the transaction.

Early in 2025, the Nigerian Air Force proposed selling its Mi-24 helicopters to Ukraine; however, despite initial interest, Ukraine declined the offer due to the aircraft's deteriorated condition.

As documented by Oryx blog as of 27 May 2025, visually confirmed helicopter losses stand at: for Russia—4 Mi-24P, 4 Mi-24V/P/35M, and 10 Mi-35M; for Ukraine—2 Mi-24P and 7 Mi-24s of unspecified variants.

Variants

Main article: List of Mil Mi-24 variants

Operators

File:Mil Mi-24 operators.svg

Operators

  Active

  Former

Template:Flagcountry

• Afghan Air Force – 8 Mi-25s recorded in 2021

Template:DZA

• Algerian Air Force – Operating 30 Mi-24MKIII helicopters as of 2024

Template:Country data Angola

• Angolan Air Force – Maintains 15 Mi-35 units as of 2024

Template:ARM

• Armenian Air Force – Equipped with 20 Mi-35 helicopters as of 2024

Template:AZE

• Azerbaijani Air Forces – Possesses 23 Mi-24Vs and 25 Mi-35s as of 2024

Template:BLR

• Belarus Air Force – Fielding 25 Mi-35 helicopters as of 2024, with additional deliveries anticipated by year-end

File:Mil Mi-35 (15077654075).jpg

Brazilian Air Force Mi-35M

File:Mil Mi-24 belly.jpg

A Bulgarian Air Force Mi-24 flying

Template:BUL

• Bulgarian Air Force – Operates 6 Mi-24V models, with 6 Mi-24D Hind D stored, status as of 2025

Template:Country data Burkina Faso

• Burkina Faso Air Force – Has 2 Mi-24 helicopters as of 2023

Template:BDI

• National Defence Force (Burundi) – Reported to have 2 Mi-35 helicopters as of 2012

Template:Country data Chad

• Chadian Air Force – Equipped with 3 Mi-35s as of 2024

Template:Country data Congo, Republic of the

• Congolese Air Force – Operating a single Mi-35 helicopter as of 2024

 Democratic Republic of the Congo

• Congolese Democratic Air Force – Maintains a fleet of 8 Mi-35s as recorded in 2024

Template:CUB

• Cuban Air Force – Has 4 Mi-35 helicopters in service as of 2024

File:Mil Mi 24 - RIAT 2007 (2544153657).jpg

A Czech Air Force Mi-24

Template:DJI

• Djibouti Air Force – Possesses 2 Mi-35 helicopters as of 2024

Egypt

• Egyptian Air Force – Operating 13 Mi-24V helicopters as reported in 2024

Template:Country data Eritrea

• Eritrean Air Force – Equipped with 6 Mi-35 units as of 2024

Template:Country data Ethiopia

• Ethiopian Air Force – Fielding 6 Mi-35 helicopters according to data from 2024

File:Mi-24 N09 l.JPG

Georgian Air Force Mi-24

Template:Country data Georgia

• Georgian Air Force – Has a complement of 9 Mi-24 helicopters as of 2024

Template:Country data Guinea

• Guinean Air Force – Operating 3 Mi-25 helicopters as recorded in 2024

File:Mi-24 Airshow 2007 Hungary 01.JPG

Hungarian Mi-24

Template:HUN

• Hungarian Air Force – Maintains a fleet including 6 Mi-24V and 2 Mi-24P models as of 2025

India

• Indian Air Force – Operating a total of 15 Mi-25/35 helicopters reported in 2023

Template:IDN

File:Garuda Shield (15030956879).jpg

An AH-64E Apache Guardian alongside an Indonesian Army Mi-35

• Indonesian Army – Equipped with seven Mi-35P helicopters

Template:Country data Iraq

• Iraqi Army Aviation – Operates a fleet of 23 Mi-35 helicopters

Template:Country data Kazakhstan

• Military of Kazakhstan – Fields twelve Mi-35M helicopters as per the latest data from 2024

Template:Country data Kyrgyzstan

• Military of Kyrgyzstan – Possesses two Mi-24V helicopters as reported in 2023

Template:LBY

• Libyan Air Force – Details available up to the year 2019

Template:Country data Mali

• Air Force of Mali – Operating seven Mi-35M helicopters according to data from 2024

Template:Country data Mozambique

• Mozambique Air Force – Has two Mi-25 units as recorded in 2023

Template:MYA

• Myanmar Air Force – Equipped with twenty-four Mi-35P helicopters

Template:Country data Namibia

• Namibian Air Force – Fielding two Mi-35s as per reports from 2023

File:Nigerian Air Force Mil Mi-24V Iwelumo-2.jpg

Nigerian Air Force Mil Mi-24V

 Niger

• Air Force of Niger – Operating one Mi-35 helicopter as of early 2024

Nigeria

• Nigerian Air Force – Maintains fifteen Mi-35 helicopters according to the latest figures from 2024

Template:PAK

• Pakistan Army – Equipped with four Mi-35M3 helicopters reported in 2022

File:MI-35P FAP Peru.jpg

Peruvian Air Force Mi-25D

Template:PER

• Peruvian Air Force – Operating sixteen Mi-35 units based on data from 2024

Template:POL

• Polish Land Forces – Has sixteen Mi-24D/V models in service projected for the year 2025

File:Russian Air Force Mil Mi-24P Dvurekov-3.jpg

Russian Aerospace Forces Mil Mi-35P

Template:RUS

• Russian Aerospace Forces – Fielding a combined total of ninety-six Mil Mi-24D/V/P and fifty-six Mil Mi-35P helicopters
• Russian Naval Aviation – Operating eight Mil Mi-24P helicopters
• Border Service of Russia

Template:Country data Rwanda

• Rwandan Air Force – Maintains five Mil Mi-35 helicopters according to data from early 2024

File:Sadejstvo 2020 - Mi-35M 35104 VS 04.jpg

Serbian Mil Mi-35M during Sadejstvo military exercise

Template:Country data Serbia

• Serbian Air Force – Operating four Mil Mi-35M and eleven Mil Mi-35P helicopters

Template:Country data Senegal

• Senegalese Air Force – Equipped with three Mil Mi-35 units as recorded in recent years

Template:Country data Sierra Leone

• Sierra Leone Air Wing – Fielding two Mil Mi-35 helicopters

Template:Country data Sri Lanka

• Sri Lanka Air Force – Operating nine Mil Mi-35V models

Template:Country data Sudan

• Sudanese Air Force – Has a fleet comprising thirty-five Mil Mi-35 helicopters

Template:Country data Syria

• Syrian Air Force – Maintaining twenty-seven Mil Mi-25 units

Template:Country data Tajikistan

• Tajik Air Force – Equipped with six Mil Mi-25 helicopters based on data from recent years

Template:Country data Turkmenistan

• Military of Turkmenistan – Status noted up to year 2019

File:Uganda People's Defence Force Air Wing Mil Mi-24V MTI-1.jpg

Uganda People's Defence Force Mil Mi-24V

Template:Country data Uganda

• Ugandan Air Force – Operating six Mil Mi-35 helicopters as reported in early 2024

Template:UKR

• Ukrainian Ground Forces – Fielding forty-five Mil Mi-24 units

Template:USA

• United States Air Force – Utilizes these aircraft for aggressor training purposes

Template:Country data Uzbekistan

• Uzbekistan Air and Air Defence Forces – Maintaining thirty-three Mil Mi-35 helicopters

Template:Country data Venezuela

• Army of Venezuela – Equipped with nine Mil Mi-35 units

Template:Country data Yemen

• Yemen Air Force – Operates fourteen MilMi -35 aircraft according to recent records

Template:Country data Zimbabwe

• Air Force of Zimbabwe – Possesses six MilMi -35 helicopters as per latest data

Former Users

Template:ARM

• Artsakh Defence Army

Template:BRA

• Brazilian Air Force

Croatia

• Croatian Air Force

Cyprus

• Cypriot National Guard – sold 11 helicopters to Serbia in November 2023

Czech Republic

• Czech Air Force – phased out and delivered to Ukraine in August 2023.

Template:Country data Czechoslovakia

Czechoslovak Air Force

Template:Country data Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinean Air Force

Template:Country data East Germany

• East German Air Force – assets absorbed by Germany following reunification

Germany

• German Army – inherited from East Germany in 1990, retired by 1993.

Template:Flagicon image Kampuchea

• Kampuchean People's Revolutionary Air Force

Template:NIC

• Fuerza Aérea Sandinista

Template:Country data North Macedonia

• Air Force of North Macedonia

Slovakia

• Slovak Air Force

Template:Country data South Yemen

• People's Democratic Republic of Yemen Air Force

File:Vietnamese Air Force Mil Mi-24A MRD.jpg

Vietnam People's Air Force Mi-24

Template:Country data Soviet Union

• Soviet Air Force – assets distributed among successor countries

Template:Country data Serbia and Montenegro

• Special Operations Unit

Template:Country data Transnistria

• Transnistria Air Force

Template:Country data Vietnam

• Vietnam People's Air Force

Potential operators

Template:PRK

• Korean People's Army Air and Anti-Air Force - estimated to operate around 20 Mi-35 helicopters as of 2024. There are suggestions that they might not possess any, with some assertions linked to inaccuracies by the Congressional Research Service.

Exhibited aircraft

Mi-24 helicopters are displayed in various museums worldwide, including:

Russia	Central Air Force Museum, Monino – Mi-24A and Mi-25 models
Belgium	Royal Museum of the Armed Forces and Military History, Brussels – Mi-24
Brazil	Museu Aeroespacial, Rio de Janeiro – Mi-35M variant
Bulgaria	Plovdiv Airport, Aviation Museum – Mi-24 National Museum of Military History, Bulgaria – Mi-24 d/b
Czech Republic	Prague Aviation Museum, Kbely – Mi-24D with tactical number 0220
China	Chinese Aviation Museum, Beijing – Mi-24
Denmark	Panzermuseum East, Slagelse – East German Mi-24P Hind-F from 1989 (serial number: 340339). Originally assigned NVA s/n 464, later German Army s/n 96+49.Template:Fix/category
Ethiopia	Martyrs Memorial Monument, Bahir Dar - Mi-24A
Germany	Luftwaffenmuseum der Bundeswehr, Berlin – Mi-24D and Mi-24P models Technik Museum Speyer
Hungary	Museum of Hungarian Aviation, Szolnok Kertészet, Szajol – Mi-24D with tactical number 577
Iran	Sa'ad Abad Museum located in Tehran
Latvia	Riga Aviation Museum, Riga – Mi-24A with tactical number 20
Nicaragua	Airforce Base at Augusto C. Sandino International Airport, Managua – Mi-25 bearing tactical number 361
Poland	Polish Army Museum, Warsaw – Mi-24D with tactical number 013 Polish Air Force Museum, Dęblin – Mi-24D carrying tactical number 016 Polish Aviation Museum, Kraków – Mi-24D model
South Africa	South African Air Force Museum, Swartkops Air Force Base – Displays one Mi-24A formerly operated by the Algerian Air Force
Slovakia	Military History Museum in Piešťany – Mi-24D with tactical number 0100
Sri Lanka	Sri Lanka Air Force Museum, Ratmalana SLAF Hingurakgoda Defence Headquarters Complex, Akuregoda, Sri Jayawardenapura Kotte
Ukraine	Museum of the Great Patriotic War, Kyiv – Mi-24B variant Ukraine State Aviation Museum, Kyiv – Models include Mi-24A, Mi-24D, Mi-24P, and Mi-24V
United Kingdom	The Helicopter Museum, Weston-super-Mare, Somerset – Mi-24D "96+26". Midland Air Museum, Coventry Airport – Loaned Mi-24D "Red 6" from BAE SYSTEMS.
United States	Southern Museum of Flight, Birmingham, Alabama Pima Air and Space Museum, Tucson, Arizona Cold War Air Museum, Lancaster, Texas Russell Military Museum, Zion, Illinois – Displays Mi-24D "110" Threat Training Facility at Nellis Air Force Base, North Las Vegas, Nevada - Former Iraqi Air Force Mi-25 Hind-D serial number sn3140
Vietnam	Vietnam People's Air Force Museum, Hanoi – Exhibits a Mi-24A model Vietnam People's Air Force Museum, Ho Chi Minh City – Also displays a Mi-24A variant

Specifications (Mi-24)

Orthographic view of the Mil Mi-24.

Orthographic view of the Mil Mi-24.

File:Mi-24 door opened at Cottbus airfield.jpg

Rear troop compartment cabin door

File:Krzesiny 82RB.JPG

Potential weapons setup on Mi-24W

File:YakB-127.jpg

Yakushev-Borzov YakB-12.7 mm machine gun

File:Center2019Exercise-17.jpg

Mi-24 participating in "Centre 2019" exercise

In popular culture

The Mi-24 has been featured prominently in numerous films and holds a significant presence within a variety of video games.

External links

• Mil Mi-24, Mi-25, Mi-35 Hind Akbar at Indian military database
• CzechAirSpotters gallery featuring the Mi-24
• Mi-24PN photo collection
• Overview of Mi-24 service history, tactics, and variants
• Sri Lanka Air Force Rescue Operation involving the Mi-24
• Modelers’ perspective on the Mi-24 Hind
• Detailed walkaround photographs of the Mi-24D