Ontario Hydro
| Company type | Crown corporation |
|---|---|
| Industry | Electric utility |
| Predecessor | Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario |
| Founded | 1906 |
| Headquarters | Ontario , Canada |
Area served | Ontario, Canada |
| Products | Electricity generation and transmission (hydroelectric, coal-fired, nuclear) |
Ontario Hydro, originally founded in 1906 under the name Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario, functioned as a publicly owned electricity provider within Ontario. Its initial mandate was to construct transmission infrastructure to supply municipal utilities with electricity generated by private operators at Niagara Falls. Shortly thereafter, it began acquiring private generating stations and increasing its own production capabilities. After utilizing most available hydroelectric resources, the organization expanded into coal-fired power plants and subsequently nuclear energy facilities. The entity was rebranded as "Ontario Hydro" in 1974, and by the 1990s had grown into one of the largest fully integrated electric utilities in North America.
Origins
The concept of harnessing electric power from the Niagara River dates back to 1888 when the Niagara Parks Commission invited proposals for an electric scenic railway running between Queenston and Chippawa. The Niagara Falls Park & River Railway secured the concession in 1892 and, by 1900, operated what was then Canada’s largest dynamo at . From 1899 onward, various private groups sought rights for power generation, including:
- Canadian Niagara Power Company, supported by British interests
- Ontario Power Company, backed by American investors
- Electrical Development Company, affiliated with Toronto transit and electric enterprises controlled by William Mackenzie, Frederic Thomas Nicholls, and Henry Mill Pellatt
By 1900, Niagara’s generating capacity had reached , prompting concerns about public access to this resource. At a June 1902 conference held in Berlin, a report recommended legislation empowering municipalities to establish cooperatives for electrical energy development and trade. Premier George William Ross’s government initially dismissed these recommendations; only after his electoral defeat in 1905 did initiatives to create a public utility gain momentum. During that election campaign, James Pliny Whitney pledged:
Formation of the Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario
In May 1906, the Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario ("Hydro" or "HEPCO") was officially formed, appointing its first commissioners: Adam Beck, John S. Hendrie, and Cecil B. Smith. HEPCO operated with a hybrid organizational structure combining elements of a government department, crown corporation, and municipal cooperative alongside private entities—reflecting a politically motivated response following the 1905 election.
By January 1, 1907, referendums held in Toronto and eighteen other municipalities ratified provisional agreements with HEPCO that authorized bond issues to finance local distribution infrastructure. The leadership efforts of Adam Beck’s associate, William Peyton Hubbard, were instrumental in securing these approvals. The inaugural transmission lines supplied electricity to southwestern Ontario by 1910, with Berlin (later Kitchener) becoming the first city powered via long-distance transmission from Niagara Falls.
The typical process for Hydro’s expansion into municipalities involved:
- Requests from municipal councils for local distribution systems;
- Assessments by Hydro engineers concerning facilities and anticipated load;
- Negotiations of provisional contracts contingent upon voter approval;
- Issuance of thirty-year debentures to fund construction;
- Construction of tie lines connecting municipalities to Hydro’s network.
During the 1920s, Hydro experienced significant growth:
- In September 1921, it acquired the Toronto Electric Light Company along with associated railway interests, establishing itself as the world’s largest electric power system. Legislation enacted in 1922 prevented late claims against these acquired assets.
- Amendments passed in 1921 and 1924 introduced grant-in-aid initiatives aimed at promoting rural electrification by reducing rates in designated regions.
- By the late 1920s, most private power producers found it difficult to compete with Hydro’s expansion efforts, leading many either to exit or focus on unserved markets.
In 1926, the Ferguson administration authorized the Abitibi Power and Paper Company to develop the Abitibi Canyon Generating Station, which became Ontario’s largest facility since Niagara Falls. This project was supported by confidential long-term purchase contracts and indemnities benefiting Hydro. Although immediate demand for this added capacity was limited, Abitibi entered receivership in 1932. Subsequent legislation permitted Ontario Hydro to take control over multiple Abitibi developments. The controversy surrounding this takeover—known as the "great Abitibi swindle"—played a role in toppling the Henry government during the 1934 election.
By 1939, HEPCO had obtained regulatory authority over all electricity generators within Ontario as well as powers to acquire underperforming utilities, thereby consolidating provincial control over power production.
In 1948, HEPCO transitioned most of its electrical system from a frequency of 25 Hz to 60 Hz; however, Fort Erie continued operating on 25 Hz until 1966 and maintained uninterrupted service during the 1965 Eastern Seaboard Blackout.
By the mid-20th century, Hydro functioned as a fully integrated utility. Postwar demand increases prompted extensive expansions of hydroelectric stations. In 1953, Ontario Hydro began establishing interconnections with American utilities—starting with the Keith-Waterman line connecting Windsor to Detroit Edison at an initial voltage of 120 kV later upgraded to 230 kV by 1973. Additional links were developed with New York State utilities. This period also witnessed construction of coal-fired generating plants that expanded throughout the 1960s and ’70s before nuclear power capacity eventually surpassed coal generation.
Hydro-Electric Railways
In 1912, Adam Beck advocated for the development of electric interurban railways within the commission's jurisdiction, which resulted in the Legislative Assembly passing The Hydro-Electric Railway Act, 1914. Despite this early support, changes in governmental policies and public attitudes during the 1920s curtailed further expansion, leading to the discontinuation of all such services by the 1930s, except for the Hamilton Street Railway streetcar system, which continued operations until 1946.
Expansion
During the 1960s, HEPCO led the introduction of ultra-high voltage (UHV) transmission lines across North America. The planning phase began in 1960, culminating in 1967 with the commissioning of 500,000-volt lines that transmitted hydroelectric power from Northern Ontario to key urban centers including Toronto, London, and Ottawa. By 1970, nearly all municipal electricity providers in Ontario were interconnected within a single grid. Through the 1970s and 1980s, Ontario Hydro further extended this 500 kV transmission infrastructure to its present magnitude.
Prior to the activation of its nuclear facilities, Ontario Hydro’s generation capacity and annual output (as of 1969) were as follows:
| Power source | Type | Dependable capacity (GW) | Annual energy output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generated | Hydro-electric | 5.8 | 32,662.5 GWh (117,585,000 GJ) |
| Thermal-electric | 4.7 | 18,771.4 GWh (67,577,040 GJ) | |
| Purchased | Hydro-electric | 0.5 | 6,503.5 GWh (23,412,600 GJ) |
| Nuclear | 0.2 | 411.5 GWh (1,481,400 GJ) | |
| Total | 11.2 | 62,448.9 GWh (224,816,040 GJ) | |
HEPCO becomes Ontario Hydro
In 1974, the commission underwent restructuring into a crown corporation and adopted the name Ontario Hydro,[1], embracing a longstanding nickname. Across many Canadian provinces including Ontario, "hydro" has become a common term for electric power irrespective of its production method.
Nuclear power stations
Starting in the late 1950s, the corporation embarked on designing and constructing CANDU nuclear power facilities. The first commercial nuclear plant began operation at Douglas Point in 1965.
Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, Ontario Hydro expanded its nuclear portfolio with an initial four reactors at Pickering Nuclear Generating Station, followed by development at Bruce Nuclear Generating Station and an additional four reactors at Pickering. By the end of the 1980s, Ontario Hydro managed one of the largest nuclear fleets globally.
| Station | Units | In service | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear Power Demonstration | 1 | 1962 | Decommissioned 1987 |
| Douglas Point | 1 | 1968 | Decommissioned 1984; site leased to Bruce Power by OPG; equipment owned by AECL |
| Bruce | 1–4 | 1977–1979 | Unit 3 restricted to 92.5% capacity |
| 5–8 | 1984–1987 | Operated by Bruce Power; site owned by OPG | |
| Pickering | 1–4 | 1971 | (Units 2–3 currently in safe shutdown) |
| 5–8 | 1983 | ||
| Darlington | 1–4 | 1990–1993 | Operated by OPG |
In 2011, the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station achieved distinction as the world’s largest nuclear power plant based on net electrical output rating, total number of reactors, and operational units.
The final nuclear facility constructed in Ontario, Darlington Nuclear Generating Station, was initially planned during the 1970s but encountered significant construction delays triggered by political decisions beginning in 1981. These postponements caused project costs to escalate from $7.0 billion to $14.5 billion, with delay-related factors responsible for approximately 70% of this increase.
Management challenges, excess capacity, and budget overruns
Concerns regarding the effectiveness of management had persisted for years, largely due to the corporation's vast scale. In 1922, a commissioner stepped down, citing issues related to operational inefficiency.
During the 1970s, Ontario Hydro’s approach to expansion underwent critical examination through multiple commissions:
- The Solandt Commission (1974–1975) evaluated transmission line projects connecting Nanticoke Generating Station to Pickering and from Lennox Generating Station to Oshawa.
- The Porter Commission in 1980 advocated for prioritizing demand management over further capacity growth; however, this recommendation was mostly disregarded.
The 1980s experienced notable rate hikes driven by several factors:
- Budget overruns at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station,
- Excess costs from boiler supplies provided by Babcock & Wilcox Canada, amounting to $850 million,
- Take-or-pay agreements with Rio Algom and Denison Mines for uranium supplies that were cancelled in 1991, incurring a $717 million loss after uranium prices plummeted.
In 1989, Ontario Hydro released Providing the Balance of Power, a comprehensive four-volume forecast extending to 2014 that presented various options for replacing aging power generation assets. This strategy was undermined by reduced electricity demand during the early 1990s economic downturn.
Dissolution and restructuring
The Energy Competition Act, 1998 was enacted by the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in 1998, which:
- Enabled the creation of an electricity market,
- Divided Ontario Hydro into five separate entities: Ontario Power Generation (OPG), Ontario Hydro Services Company (later renamed Hydro One), the Independent Electricity Market Operator (subsequently Independent Electricity System Operator), the Electrical Safety Authority, and Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation. (OPG and Hydro One were intended to transition into private-sector businesses rather than remain as crown corporations.)
Operations under Ontario Hydro ended on March 31, 1999. By law, its assets and responsibilities were transferred to two commercial successors—Ontario Power Generation Inc. and Ontario Hydro Services Company Inc.—alongside two non-profit organizations: the Independent Electricity Market Operator and the Electrical Safety Authority.
Stranded debt
As of March 31, 1999, Ontario Hydro reported long-term liabilities totaling $26.2 billion against assets valued at $39.6 billion.
Nevertheless, the actual market value of these assets was significantly lower than reported, creating stranded debt amounting to $19.5 billion—the gap between asset fair value and total debt/liabilities assigned to successor entities. This stranded debt was established to maintain the financial stability of these new organizations.
Since 2002, repayment of this stranded debt has been funded through a Debt Retirement Charge imposed on Ontario electricity consumers. This fee is set at 0.7 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) used.
By March 31, 2014, outstanding stranded debt had decreased to $2.6 billion. Beginning in 2016, the Ontario government eliminated the Debt Retirement Charge from residential electricity bills and completed its phase-out for all customers by April 1, 2018.
Further reading
- (Business History, Section 14)
See also
External links
- ↑ changing the Power Commission Act to the Power Corporation Act
- Articles with short description
- Ontario Hydro
- Defunct electric power companies of Canada
- Hydroelectric power companies of Canada
- Nuclear power companies of Canada
- Ontario electricity policy
- Ontario Power Generation
- Non-renewable resource companies established in 1906
- Non-renewable resource companies disestablished in 1999
- 1906 establishments in Ontario
- 1999 disestablishments in Ontario
- Canadian companies established in 1906
- Former Crown corporations of Ontario