Jump to content

Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant

From Alfawiki
Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant
IndustryNuclear power generation
Founded1990 in Seabrook, New Hampshire, United States
FounderPublic Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH)
SuccessorNextEra Energy Resources (since 2002)
Headquarters
Seabrook
,
United States
Area served
New England electrical network
ProductsElectricity generation (nuclear)
OwnerNextEra Energy Resources (88.2% controlling share), municipal utilities in Massachusetts (remaining shares)
Number of employees
650 (2013)
ParentNextEra Energy Resources

The Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant, also known as Seabrook Station, is a nuclear energy facility located in Seabrook, New Hampshire, United States. It lies approximately north of Boston and south of Portsmouth. Since commencing operations in 1990, its single 1,244-megawatt reactor has stood as the largest individual power generator on the New England electrical network and ranks as the region’s second-largest nuclear installation after the two-unit Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut.

Initially designed to include two reactors, only Unit 1 was brought online in 1990—14 years following the issuance of its construction permit. The second unit was ultimately abandoned amid public opposition, escalating costs, and financial difficulties. These factors contributed significantly to the bankruptcy of the plant’s original owner, PSNH. Ownership and operation of the facility have been under NextEra Energy Resources since 2002.

Construction of Seabrook Station

The Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) initiated plans for a nuclear power station in 1966, first considering a site in Newington. However, a permit was denied due to its proximity to Pease Air Force Base. Subsequently, the location was shifted to Seabrook, with construction blueprints finalized by 1972. PSNH anticipated bringing the first reactor online by 1979 and the second by 1981, estimating total costs below $1 billion. Early projections were optimistic, with minimal resistance expected and unanimous local support.

Construction commenced in August 1976 with participation from sixteen utility companies. Regulatory obstacles soon arose; notably, the EPA rejected the proposed cooling water discharge system in 1976—a decision that was reversed in 1978. Public protests and acts of civil disobedience intensified in 1977, resulting in over 1,400 arrests. The 1979 Three Mile Island accident further diminished investor confidence. Six New Hampshire municipalities within the 10-mile emergency planning zone declined to develop evacuation strategies, prompting intervention by the NRC in 1980. Opposition also came from six Massachusetts towns and political figures such as Governor Michael Dukakis, leading to legal disputes.

By 1984, mounting financial pressures and regulatory challenges led to the cancellation of the second reactor after reaching only 25% completion and spending $800 million. Unit 1 was finalized in 1986; however, PSNH’s significant debt load caused it to declare bankruptcy in 1988—one of the largest corporate bankruptcies recorded in the United States at that time.

Seabrook Station’s completion occurred nearly a decade behind schedule with expenses approaching $7 billion. The NRC later acknowledged shortcomings in its oversight practices, describing them as "fragmented and uncoordinated," which imposed substantial burdens on both government agencies and the economy through excessive regulation.

NextEra Energy and Recent Developments

Seabrook Station was initially owned by more than ten utility companies spanning five states in New England. In 2002, FPL Energy (currently known as NextEra Energy Resources) acquired a majority interest for $836.6 million, obtaining an 88.2% controlling share. The remaining ownership stakes remain with municipal utilities in Massachusetts. Seabrook is among five nuclear power plants managed by NextEra Energy, which also operates Florida Power & Light’s St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant and Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, along with NextEra Energy Resources’ Duane Arnold Energy Center and Point Beach Nuclear Generating Station.

During the 2008 U.S. presidential election, Republican candidate John McCain advocated for constructing a second reactor at Seabrook. This proposal received measured support but faced significant financial and regulatory obstacles.

In 2009, the facility was officially renamed NextEra Energy Seabrook, though it continues to be widely referred to as Seabrook Station.

By 2017, decreasing valuations of nuclear plants, including Seabrook’s, led the town of Seabrook to implement a 9.9% tax hike to compensate for diminished tax revenues from NextEra Energy. Two years later, New Hampshire lawmakers proposed House Bill 1661 to eliminate Seabrook’s property tax exemption on components related to pollution control; however, the legislation did not pass in 2020.

In April 2020, Massachusetts congressional representatives such as Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey urged both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and NextEra to release details of Seabrook’s COVID-19 response plan amid safety concerns during a refueling outage involving hundreds of personnel. The NRC granted exemptions that permitted extended working hours and postponed inspections to reduce virus transmission risks.

Starting in the early 2020s, NextEra became involved in a dispute with utility company Avangrid over the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC) transmission project from Canada. Before connecting to the grid, upgrades to Seabrook’s primary generator breaker were necessary, triggering ongoing legal disagreements concerning upgrade expenses and accountability. In February 2023, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission directed NextEra Energy Resources to proceed with breaker enhancements planned for the fall 2024 refueling outage.

Relicensing

Seabrook Station applied in 2010 to extend its operating license from its original expiration in 2030 to 2050. In 2012, Massachusetts Representatives Edward Markey and John F. Tierney introduced H.R. 6554, known as the "Nuclear Reactor Safety First Act," which sought to prohibit NRC license renewals requested more than ten years prior to expiration—specifically targeting Seabrook’s extension—but this bill failed to advance out of committee.

During the relicensing process, concerns emerged regarding concrete deterioration caused by alkali–silica reaction (ASR) due to groundwater intrusion affecting the plant’s foundations, attracting political scrutiny at the local level. In June 2017, NRC personnel evaluated NextEra’s safety strategy addressing ASR and conducted an inspection of the facility. By October 2017, federal regulators permitted the watchdog organization C-10 to take part in reviewing the license amendment.

On March 12, 2019, the NRC granted a 20-year renewal of Seabrook’s operating license, extending authorization through March 15, 2050. Subsequently, C-10 submitted an emergency petition seeking to suspend this extension pending additional hearings on ASR issues; however, the NRC rejected this request in July 2019. In August 2020, the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) approved Seabrook’s concrete monitoring program but imposed further requirements aimed at safeguarding public health and safety.

In May 2021, Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey voiced apprehensions regarding the ASLB ruling and called on the NRC to reopen proceedings for supplementary testimony while strengthening license conditions related to ASR surveillance.

Community impact

In 2013, the Nuclear Energy Institute emphasized Seabrook Station's notable economic and environmental benefits:

  • Providing employment for 650 individuals earning salaries more than double the average in Rockingham and Strafford counties
  • Supplying roughly 40% of New Hampshire’s electricity while preventing nearly 4 million tons of CO2 emissions annually—comparable to taking close to 700,000 vehicles off the road
  • Injecting $535 million into the local economy and $1.4 billion nationwide every year, with each dollar generated stimulating $1.34 in local economic activity
  • Contributing over $1 million to regional environmental organizations throughout the past ten years

Seabrook Station has played a crucial role for Massachusetts in complying with carbon emission standards. Its significance became particularly evident following the 2015 shutdown of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, which led to an increase in New England’s carbon emissions after five years of decline. According to ISO New England projections, decreases in nuclear energy production across the region are unlikely to be compensated by renewable sources but rather through greater reliance on natural gas. A 2011 forecast suggested that substituting Seabrook with a gas-powered facility would have resulted in nearly 94 million metric tons of CO2 emissions over 22 years—an amount similar to Arizona’s total emissions in 2009. By 2020, municipal utilities in Massachusetts derived only 2.43% of their energy from wind and solar; nonetheless, agreements involving Seabrook and Millstone Nuclear Power Plant in Connecticut increase their share of carbon-free energy to 38.22%.

In April 2018, New Hampshire’s decade-long energy plan highlighted that maintaining Seabrook Station as a zero-emission power source represents the most economical strategy for large-scale emission management. To replicate its output using wind or solar power would necessitate approximately 290 square miles of wind turbines or about 80 square miles of solar panels.

Electricity production

Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant Generation (MWh)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual (Total)
2001 41,921 777,519 448,121 832,051 839,779 834,215 861,957 835,010 834,916 723,475 801,877 861,902 8,692,743
2002 861,532 778,337 861,664 833,602 74,714 775,728 860,831 859,337 832,281 861,835 833,121 861,635 9,294,617
2003 861,034 777,401 861,171 832,708 862,309 834,673 862,222 861,602 820,133 124,682 715,873 862,480 9,276,288
2004 861,327 805,718 862,022 833,556 862,936 835,415 861,348 862,421 833,696 862,527 833,935</ small > < small >862 ,672 </ small > 10 ,177 ,573
2005 < small >862 ,341 </ small > < small >779 ,160 </ small > < small >778 ,883 </ small > 0 < small >768 ,661 </ small > < small >877 ,645 </ small > < small >906 ,870 </ small > < small >906 ,912 </ small > < small >878 ,860 </ small > < small >909 ,792 </ small > < small >878 ,871 </ small > < small >907 ,890 </ small > 9 ,455 ,885
2006 < small >907 ,440 </ small > < small >819 ,423 </ small > < small >907 ,933 </ small > < small >877 ,444 </ small > < small >908 ,907 </ small > < small >879 ,308 </ small > < small >909 ,271 </ small > < small >900 ,773 </ small > < small >773 ,949 </ small > 0 < small >587 ,972 </ small > < small >925 ,436 </ small > 9 ,397 ,856
2007 < small >877 ,980 </ small > < small >836 ,094 </ small > < small >871 ,034 </ small > < small >856 ,511 </ small > < small >927 ,331 </ small > < small >897 ,115 </ small > < small >926 ,577 </ small > < small >925 ,890 </ small > < small >896 ,620 </ small > < small >925 ,105 </ small > < small >897 ,572 </ small > < small >926 ,055 </ small > 10 ,763 ,884
2008 < small >567 ,522 </ small > < small >840 ,007 </ small > < small >922 ,125 </ small > 0 < small >667 ,538 </ small > < small >856 ,165 </ small > < small >927 ,107 </ small > < small >925 ,640 </ small > < small >896 ,541 </ small > < small >926 ,492 </ small > < small >895 ,088 </ small > < small >926 ,089 </ Small > 9 350 314
2009
 |
 924 993 
 |
 836 579 
 |
 925 103 
 |
 896 458 
 |
 926 038 
 |
 896 326 
 |
 926 131 
 |
 926 113 
 |
 892 480 
 |

0

 |

340 343

 |

326 109

8 816 673
2010

927 742

837 938

926 131

898 144

928 582

898 222

927 501

925 652

894 276

926 149

892 658

927 060

10 910 055
2011

927 234

814 532

923 218

0

218 028

863 528

927 644

925 774

895 657

230 977

898 957

737 258

8 362 807
2012

686 107

736 148

782 071

698 730

785 079

758 859

782 130

786 418

351 833

17 280

888 147

916 379

8 189 181
2013

928 572

838 463

927 730

898 799

928 720

897 851

926 855

927 947

896 959

926 972

899 554

928 303

10 926 725
2014

927 753

838 349

924 168

145 911

928 290

898 153

928 334

926 279

896 814

927 169

899 018

928 027

10 168 265
2015

927 399

837 795

926 963

898 491

928 074

897 051

926 131

926 225

822 759

139

464 155

929 022

9 484 204
2016

873 846

869 998

773 858

901 301

931 020

899 774

928 958

926 246

897 061

928 360

900 912

929 829

10 761 163
2017

930 333

840 397

925 581

1

874 245

900 838

929 978

930 294

897 300

929 471

902 100

930 166

9 990 704
2018

930 613

840 633

929 256

900 810

931 139

900 493

929 824

927 694

881 873

62 127

899 007

928 227

10 061 696
2019

927 928

837 893

927 070

899 150

928 832

898 058

927 354

926 201

894 269

926 621

885 497

928 050

10 906 923
2020

928 053

868 306

917 653

56 214

855 391

732 887

927 487

926 703

896 511

928 340

899 423

928 228

9 865 196
2021

927 671

838 377

927 417

899 157

928 624

898 816

926 509

925 835

895 720

26 952

732 471

928 568

9 856 117
2022

928 237

838 502

926 877

898 677

929 014

897 880

927 660

922 448

896 600

927 418

899 985

928 230

10 921 528
2023

928 464

837 889

924 540

2

628 777

898 790

888 108

778 916

896 929

928 520

895 304

928 542

9 534 781
2024

928 657

868 789

927 403

899 602

904 962

899 488

928 222

925 881

896 859

115 441

515 760

865 798

9 676 862
2025

927 147

829 174

926 259

897 963


Significant Incidents

In 1998, a plant electrician was dismissed after reporting a safety issue related to system wiring. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducted an investigation and determined the dismissal constituted discrimination, resulting in a Severity Level III violation accompanied by a $55,000 penalty.

In 2000, one of Seabrook Station's emergency diesel generators malfunctioned during testing due to crankcase overpressurization and damage caused by thermal expansion of the piston skirt. The NRC identified this as a White finding, citing insufficient corrective measures for deteriorated components.

A security fence installed by a subcontractor failed to meet NRC standards in 2005 due to design and testing shortcomings, which led to a $65,000 fine.

During the 2012 refueling outage, a magnitude 4.0 earthquake impacted the southern Maine coastline. An "Unusual Event" was declared; however, the plant's operations remained unaffected.

In 2013, Seabrook Station and its labor union narrowly avoided a lockout by finalizing a contract agreement at the last moment.

An electrical fire originating from an elevator motor in 2014 triggered an "Unusual Event" emergency classification. No injuries or safety risks were reported.

Following an NRC inquiry in 2015, a security guard received a three-year ban after being found to have blocked a rifle barrel with foreign materials.

A minor earthquake registering magnitude 2.7 occurred near the facility in 2018 without causing any damage or emergency conditions.

In mid-2020, two unplanned reactor shutdowns took place due to unexpected control rod insertions; all safety protocols operated correctly, ensuring safe reactor shutdowns.

On July 12, 2022, nine sirens within the plant’s 10-mile emergency zone were accidentally activated during routine testing. This false alarm led to beach closures in Hampton, Rye, and Seabrook and was attributed to human error.

Opposition from the Public

The successful 1975 campaign by the anti-nuclear movement in Germany that halted construction of the Wyhl Nuclear Power Plant inspired efforts to occupy the Seabrook Station site.[1] After the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) granted Seabrook’s construction permit in 1976, the Clamshell Alliance was established.[2]

On August 1, 1976, approximately 600 demonstrators assembled at Seabrook. By May 1977, more than 2,000 had occupied the site, resulting in "1,414 arraignments on criminal trespass charges," marking one of the largest mass arrests in U.S. history.[2] The Clamshell Alliance inspired other anti-nuclear groups across the United States such as the Abalone Alliance and Crabshell Alliance.Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name The protests became associated with the song "Old Settler's Song (Acres of Clams)".

Despite ongoing demonstrations, construction proceeded, ultimately leading to activist fatigue following the occupation in 1977.Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name

In September 2017, activist Steve Comley Sr. and his nonprofit organization "We The People" sponsored an electronic billboard in Salisbury, Massachusetts, highlighting concerns about the absence of an evacuation plan for Seabrook Station.Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name By January 2018, several municipalities including Merrimac, Massachusetts, urged the NRC to reassess the effectiveness of Seabrook’s evacuation strategy.Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name

NextEra Energy issued a response:

Accident analysis

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has established two distinct emergency planning zones surrounding nuclear facilities: a 10-mile radius plume exposure pathway zone, which addresses airborne radioactive hazards, and a 50-mile ingestion pathway zone, which deals with the risk of radioactive contamination in food and beverages. As of 2010, the population residing within 10 miles of Seabrook was 118,747, reflecting a growth of 10.1% over ten years; within 50 miles, the population reached 4,315,571, marking an 8.7% rise. Notable urban centers located within the 50-mile radius include Boston, approximately 40 miles away.

According to the NRC's 2010 assessment, the probability of an earthquake causing core damage at Seabrook is estimated at one in 45,455 annually.

See also

  • Seabrook 1977 – a documentary covering the protests during the plant’s construction period

External links

  1. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named protest
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named rs