Jump to content

Soviet industrial espionage of Concorde

From Alfawiki
Soviet espionage targeting Concorde
IndustryAviation, Espionage
Founded1959
Defunct1976
Area served
United Kingdom, France, Soviet Union

Allegations of Soviet Industrial Espionage Targeting the Concorde Programme span the period from 1959 to 1976. Although not every assertion has been confirmed, it is reported that sensitive materials from Sud Aviation and BAC's development efforts found their way into Soviet possession.

Background

While the Tu-144 bears notable resemblance to the Concorde and was developed during a similar timeframe, it was not a straightforward replication. Facing stringent development deadlines, Soviet insiders reportedly sought to obtain Concorde’s technological innovations, which influenced the Tu-144’s partial development and its brief passenger operations beginning in early 1978.

Research by Dr. Calder Walton at Harvard's Belfer Center uncovered documents from Vasili Mitrokhin, a former KGB archivist who defected, indicating that Ivor James Gregory, an engineer employed by British European Airways, allegedly handed over approximately 90,000 pages of classified material to Soviet intelligence agencies during the 1970s.

The Soviet Amtorg Trading Corporation maintained surveillance on Concorde for many years.

Engineers from Bristol Siddeley, particularly those involved with the Olympus 593 engine project, were summoned to meetings at the Russian Embassy in London, demonstrating focused Soviet interest in this technology.

Soviet espionage linked to Concorde was highlighted during the 1969 International Security Conference held in the United States, where East Germany was identified as a central base for Soviet industrial spying activities across Europe.

In 1981, former intelligence operatives proposed that Soviets might have been deliberately fed deceptive information about Concorde, which could have played a role in the Tu-144 crash.

The 1996 documentary Konkordski, broadcast by Channel 4, explored Soviet espionage efforts directed at Concorde.

Parliament

On 30 November 1966, Liberal MP Eric Lubbock—an engineering graduate and ex-Rolls-Royce manager—questioned aviation minister Julian Snow regarding Soviet invitations extended to senior Bristol Siddeley executives to deliver lectures in the USSR under potentially misleading circumstances.

During a House of Commons debate on 15 February 1973, MPs Dan Jones, Robert Adley, and Kenneth Warren remarked that the Boeing 707’s development received substantial funding from the USAF due to its connection with the Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker project.

On 15 March 1973, within a House of Lords debate concerning Concorde, William Hay referred to the Tu-144 as 'Konkordski'. Shortly thereafter, the Concorde Aircraft Act 1973 was enacted. Stretford MP Winston Churchill mentioned the Kuznetsov NK-144 engine and criticized post-war Labour government decisions including transferring a Rolls-Royce Nene engine to the Soviets. This engine was reverse-engineered into Klimov VK-1 engines used in MiG-15 jets during the Korean War. Churchill repeatedly raised these topics in parliamentary debates between 1977 and 1989, emphasizing contracts held by British firms for supplying components for the NK-144 engine.

At the European Parliament session on 8 July 1975, Conservative MP and MEP Tom Normanton asserted that Soviet acquisition of Concorde blueprints likely occurred through European machine tool manufacturers operating contracts in Romania and Austria. He called upon the EEC to conduct investigations and impose confidentiality obligations on European enterprises.

In February 1977, the Conservative MP for Stretford addressed a letter to the Labour aviation minister concerning British companies providing equipment for the Kuznetsov NK-144 engine through Russia’s trade organisation LICENSINTORG.

Allegations

In September 1971, a Glasgow-based British electronics engineer confessed to divulging confidential information to the Trade Delegation of the Russian Federation in the United Kingdom, located in Highgate, north London. Residing in Ashley Down, he received £5,000 from Soviet agents, who also supplied compromising photographs to facilitate his interactions. His meetings with Soviet operatives occurred monthly at Cockfosters tube station. Previously affiliated with the Communist Party of Great Britain, he resigned in 1970. His employment at BAC spanned from November 1967 until February 1970, during which he frequently socialized with colleagues at the Anchor pub on Gloucester Road (A38) in Filton, now known as the Flaming Grill Air Balloon.

Aircraft performance

The Tu-144 achieved supersonic speed on 5 June 1969, preceding Concorde’s similar milestone reached on 1 October 1969, and later exceeded Mach 2 on 26 May 1970.

The initial French Concorde prototype 001 prioritized mastering supersonic transition, whereas the British prototype 002 targeted reaching Mach 2 by late 1970. On 4 November 1970, Concorde 001 attained Mach 2 (approximately 1370 mph) during a two-hour flight over the Atlantic Ocean.

Concorde 002's first supersonic flight was postponed from May until August 1970. It broke the sound barrier over the Irish Sea on 12 August. Subsequently, on 22 August, co-pilot Peter Baker flew Concorde 002 past 1000 mph above the North Sea, conducting the inaugural test of the engine inlet system.

During a flight from RAF Fairford to Daventry and back on 12 November 1970, Concorde 002 maintained Mach 2 at an altitude of roughly ten miles over the Irish Sea for more than an hour.

Commercial Concorde service to Moscow commenced in April 1985, offering tickets at £995 that included attendance at a Moscow ballet performance.

Arrests

  • In late 1964, French authorities detained East German Herbert Steinbrecher from Leipzig along with two British collaborators involved in espionage activities at a French aircraft manufacturing facility.
  • Sergei Fabiev, connected to the GRU since 1962, was apprehended at Orly Airport in March 1977 after intercepted communications revealed his acquisition of complete Concorde blueprints; he was sentenced to twenty years in February 1978.
  • In February 1965, French intelligence arrested Sergei Pavlov carrying detailed plans of Concorde’s landing gear and anti-lock braking system; he was deported and later appointed deputy minister for civil aviation in Moscow.
  • Czech operatives Jean Sarrady and Stephan Krigovsky were captured disguised as clergy and subsequently sentenced in April 1967 to four and eight years respectively for espionage offenses.

Effect on the design of the Tu-144

The structural designs of the Tu-144 and Concorde differed significantly. Unlike Concorde, the Tu-144 did not incorporate wing vortices that enhance lift at lower speeds and refrained from performing international demonstration flights for sales purposes. Furthermore, its engines had not undergone flight testing prior to the aircraft’s inaugural flight.

A structural failure during a steep dive led to a devastating crash at an international air show, severely damaging both the program’s reputation and its commercial viability.

External links