Jump to content

The Woman's Angle

From Alfawiki
Adapted from the English Wikipedia article The Woman's Angle, available under CC BY-SA 4.0Updated 10 August 2025
Associated British Picture Corporation
IndustryFilm production
Headquarters
United Kingdom
ProductsFilms

The Woman's Angle is a 1952 British drama directed by Leslie Arliss, featuring performances by Edward Underdown, Cathy O'Donnell, and Lois Maxwell. The screenplay, co-written by Arliss, Mabbie Pool, and Frederick Gotfurt, adapts the 1940 novel Three Cups of Coffee authored by Ruth Feiner. Produced by the Associated British Picture Corporation and distributed through Associated British-Pathé, the film achieved a UK box office gross of £91,096.

Plot

The story centers on a man belonging to a distinguished musical family who experiences three romantic relationships, culminating in divorce and ultimately finding personal fulfillment.

Cast


Production

Leslie Arliss had admired the novel since 1944. At that time, Peter Reynolds was contracted with Associated British.

The movie's funding came from the Elstree Group, a financial initiative supporting British films produced by the Associated British Pictures Corporation during the early 1950s. Associated British's productions often received partial backing from the National Film Finance Corporation.

Critical reception

The Monthly Film Bulletin criticized the film for its lack of creativity, describing it as "merely a filmed woman's magazine story" with an unrealistic tone.

Kine Weekly commented on the film’s serious nature but recognized its emotionally engaging and humorous moments, highlighting strong performances from Lois Maxwell, Claude Farell, and Cathy O'Donnell, alongside an appealing musical score featuring an original concerto.

Picturegoer regarded it as an entertaining work filled with clever wit and occasional charm, attributing Leslie Arliss’ direction and sharp dialogue for effectively managing otherwise thin material.

In British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959, David Quinlan deemed the film "mediocre," reproaching Arliss for employing an outdated Gainsborough-style approach.

The New York Times reviewer Bosley Crowther dismissed it as "a bleak example of poor writing, acting, and directing throughout."

External links